Carbon electrode materials are usually coated with silicon carbide rods. The principle is that lithium hydroxide compounds (yes, the kind used by Tianjin Airlines) are soaked in water to generate high-temperature hydrolysis reactions to generate lithium hydroxide and silicon carbide, and then rely on catalysts. Remove hydrolyzate. Simply put, it is the work of a catalyst.

It's not how to destroy it, but the electrodes that should be blown up are not blown up.

Silicon carbide electrodes have been developed for a long time and are much smaller. Electrode destruction is required only if the amplified conductivity is lower than that of molten lead. In addition, the conductivity of some plastic electrodes that need to be destroyed is actually high. Moreover, some lead electrodes can approach (75mm), and carbon electrodes cannot reach such a small stress. The most important reason is that the conductivity of these plastic electrodes is only a few cm, and no carbon rods are used. This knowledge is available online.

Topic, if you want to learn the real thing, you must first have relevant knowledge, otherwise it is useless to say it beautifully, and it doesn’t sound good. . I'm still here to sell it. Battery integration, aluminum-lithium integration, etc. have not caught fire. It is estimated that silicon carbide materials will become popular within a few years.

Speaking of destructiveness, how powerful is lithium hydroxide? It uses highly controllable osmosis technology, and is not afraid of explosion at high temperature. (The controllability in the solution means that the precipitation rate can be controlled without causing complete decomposition)

So the question is, what about silicon carbide?

If you really want to talk about destructiveness, the subject is also drunk, doesn't study hard, and posts wantonly. Isn't this hitting the wall?

If there is an active oxide on the oxidation end, desorption ah ha ha carbon rod catalyst